Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
April 17, 2012
In Re: Pool Products Distribution Market Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
2:12-md-02328
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action, Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Adams & Reese
- DLA Piper
- Finkelstein Thompson
- Heins Mills
- Kaplan Fox
- Levin Sedran
- Martzell Bickford
- Neblett Beard
- Stanley Reuter
- Stone Pigman
- Wolf Haldenstein
- Wollmuth Maher
Government Agencies
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
July 05, 2016
Monopoly Claims Drained From Pool Product Distribution MDL
Pool products distributor Pool Corp. is off the hook for allegedly trying to gain monopoly power, a Louisiana judge ruled Friday, finding that purchasers failed to show that there was a national market for pool products distribution.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login