Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
In re Carrier IQ, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation
Case Number:
3:12-md-02330
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action, Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Ademi & O'Reilly
- Alger Law APC
- Arias Ozzello
- Baker Donelson
- Barnow & Associates
- Benesch
- Blood Hurst
- Bolen Robinson
- Burns Charest
- Burns White
- Cates Law
- Cates Mahoney
- Chan Punzalan
- Chavez & Gertler
- Climaco Wilcox
- Cohen Hirsch
- Covington & Burling
- DiCello Levitt
- Eagan Donohue
- Eckert Seamans
- Ely Bettini
- Fenwick & West
- Finkelstein Thompson
- Foley Bezek
- Gibbs Law Group
- Gibson Dunn
- Glancy Prongay
- Greenberg Traurig
- Gustafson Gluek
- Hagens Berman
- H.C. Park & Associates
- Heartfield Law Firm
- Herman Gerel
- Horwitz Horwitz
- Johnson & Brown PC
- Jones Walker
- Kemnitzer Barron
- Kershaw Cutter
- Kiesel Law
- Kirtland & Packard
- Kotchen & Low
- Levin Sedran
- Lieff Cabraser
- Lockridge Grindal
- Lynch Daskal
- Mayer Brown
- Migliaccio & Rathod
- Morrison Foerster
- Munger Tolles
- Murray Law Firm
- Neblett Beard
- Newport Trial Group
- Newsome Melton
- Orrick Herrington
- O'Shea Partners
- Pearson Warshaw
- Perkins Coie
- Pomerantz LLP
- Preis PLC
- Pugh Accardo
- Ratner Molineaux
- Robbins Geller
- Robins Kaplan
- Roshka DeWulf
- Rosman & Germain
- Rothken Law Firm
- Rueb Stoller
- Shearman & Sterling
- Shub & Johns
- Skadden Arps
- Skikos Crawford
- Smith Gambrell
- Stewarts Law LLP
- Steyer Lowenthal
- Strange & Butler
- Susman Godfrey
- Thompson Hine
- Walker Wilcox
- Wasserman Comden
- Weil Gotshal
- Willkie Farr
- Winston & Strawn
- Wites Law Firm
- Zimmerman Reed
- Zuckerman Spaeder
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 25, 2016
Consumers Win OK For $9M Deal In HTC, Samsung Data Suit
A California federal judge on Thursday stamped final approval on a $9 million settlement between cellphone owners and Samsung, HTC and other mobile manufacturers accused of using software that illegally collected user data, bringing to a close nearly four years of multidistrict litigation.
-
June 24, 2016
Consumers Push For $9M Deal In HTC, Samsung Data Suit
Cellphone owners urged a California federal judge Thursday to grant final approval to a $9 million settlement with Samsung, HTC and other mobile manufacturers that could benefit around 57,000 consumers in multidistrict litigation alleging software employed by the companies illegally collected user data.
-
January 25, 2016
Carrier IQ, Samsung Ink $9M Deal To End Privacy Suit
Consumers accusing software maker Carrier IQ, along with Samsung and other cellphone manufacturers, of illegally collecting their data told a California federal judge on Friday that they've reached a $9 million deal covering 79 million people after settlement negotiations stalled last year.
-
August 24, 2015
Samsung, Others Hit Bump In Talks To Settle Privacy Claims
Nearly two months after announcing a global settlement in principle in multidistrict litigation, consumer plaintiffs and the cellphone companies they say illegally collected their data are still struggling to finalize the terms of their settlement agreement, according to a letter in California federal court Friday.
-
January 22, 2015
Cellphone Cos. Duck Some Claims In Consumer Privacy MDL
A California federal judge on Wednesday dismissed claims in a multidistrict proposed class action that HTC Corp., Samsung Electronics Co. and other device makers violated the Wiretap Act by illegally collecting consumers' data from their phones, saying that the plaintiffs didn't sufficiently allege they intended to intercept communications.
-
August 25, 2014
Samsung Privacy Claims Pass Wiretap Act Muster, Court Told
Plaintiffs suing Carrier IQ Inc., HTC Corp., Samsung Electronics Co. and others in California federal court have pushed back on efforts to toss the multidistrict class action litigation in which the telecom companies are accused of illegally collecting consumers' data from their phones, arguing their claims meet Wiretap Act standards.
-
July 24, 2014
Samsung, Others Say Wiretap Act Not Germane To Data MDL
Carrier IQ Inc., HTC Corp. and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. on Wednesday asked a California federal judge to toss multidistrict litigation accusing them and other telecom companies of illegally collecting consumers' data off their phones, arguing Wiretap Act claims simply don't hold up under scrutiny.