Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
United States of America v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
Case Number:
3:11-cv-00413
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Adams & Reese
- Bridges Law Group PLLC
- Brunini Grantham
- Fredrikson & Byron
- Gallagher & Kennedy
- Hagwood and Tipton
- Latham & Watkins
- Ropes & Gray
- Wilkins Patterson
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
November 27, 2012
Medtronic Says Off-Label Marketing FCA Claims Fall Short
Medtronic Inc. asked a Mississippi federal judge Monday to dismiss a qui tam False Claims Act suit over an alleged kickback scheme to promote off-label use of two of its products and defraud Medicare and Medicaid, saying the relator's case was based entirely on public information.
-
May 11, 2012
Medtronic Accused Of Off-Label Marketing Kickbacks Scheme
A whistleblower lawsuit unsealed in Mississippi federal court Friday alleges Medtronic Inc. and affiliated doctors violated the False Claims Act through a kickback scheme promoting off-label use of Medtronic's Infuse bone graft product and Pyramid spine plate system.