Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Guidiville Rancheria of California et al v. United States Of America et al
Case Number:
4:12-cv-01326
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Judge:
Firms
- Debevoise & Plimpton
- Downey Brand
- Gross Klein
- Harper & Armstrong
- Meyers Nave
- Morrison Foerster
- Paul Hastings
Government Agencies
-
August 18, 2015
Tribe, Casino Co. Owe MoFo $1.9M Fees Over Failed Project
A California federal judge Tuesday said a Native American tribe and a developer must pay $1.9 million in attorneys' fees for Morrison & Foerster LLP lawyers who defended a Bay Area city in litigation over a canceled casino project, saying the fees requested were largely reasonable and the tribe had waived immunity by bringing the suit.
-
April 29, 2015
Calif. City Defends $2.4M Fee Bid In Tribal Casino Feud
A Bay Area city on Tuesday defended its request for $2.4 million in attorneys' fees for the Morrison & Foerster LLP lawyers that helped it escape litigation over a scuttled casino project, saying the fees are reasonable considering the eye-popping damages sought by the developer and Native American tribe behind the suit.
-
April 23, 2015
Casino Developer Trashes Calif. City's $2.3M Atty Fee Bid
A developer that had partnered with a Native American tribe in a failed bid for a casino in a Bay Area city has told a California federal court that a $2.3 million fee bid from Morrison & Foerster LLP attorneys representing the city was unreasonably bloated.
-
March 19, 2015
Casino Developer, Tribe Blast Calif. City's $2M Atty Fee Bid
A Northern California developer and Native American tribe that lost a lawsuit over a failed bid for a casino asked a federal judge Tuesday to deny a Bay Area city's bill for $2.3 million in attorneys' fees, calling the fees "patently excessive and unreasonable."
-
July 11, 2012
Calif. City Fights For Right To Block Point Molate Casino
The city of Richmond, Calif., maintained Tuesday that it did not breach a contract with real estate developer Upstream Point Molate LLC by nixing plans to build a casino complex over environmental issues and asked a court to officially side with the city.