Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. et al
Case Number:
3:09-cv-05235
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Baker Botts
- Cooley LLP
- Crowell & Moring
- Duane Morris
- Farney PC
- Fish & Richardson
- Jones Day
- Kramer Alberti
- McKool Smith
- Miclean Gleason
- Morrison Foerster
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Orrick Herrington
- Paul Hastings
- Sheppard Mullin
- White & Case
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 23, 2019
Fairchild Strikes $175M Power Integrations Deal After 15 Years
ON Semiconductor has agreed to pay Power Integrations $175 million to end long-running litigation after ON's Fairchild subsidiary was hit with nearly $200 million in patent infringement verdicts, a resolution that means the Federal Circuit won't answer a burning question about foreign damages as part of the fight.
-
September 06, 2019
Fairchild Can't Pause $140M IP Loss For High Court Decision
A California federal judge has denied Silicon Valley pioneer Fairchild Semiconductor International Inc.'s bid to stay Power Integrations' $140 million jury win in their decade-long patent fight until after the U.S. Supreme Court issues a decision in a similar dispute.
-
February 22, 2017
Judge Won't Rethink $140M Patent Win Against Fairchild
A California judge Wednesday denied Fairchild Semiconductor International Inc.'s motion to vacate a $140 million judgment in favor of rival chip maker Power Integrations, saying a December Federal Circuit opinion that upended much of a 2012 Delaware court verdict didn't impact the Golden State case.
-
January 13, 2017
Power Integrations Denied Extra Damages In $140M IP Win
Power Integrations Inc. is not entitled to enhanced damages for its $140 million jury win against rival chip maker Fairchild Semiconductor International Inc. for patent infringement, a California federal judge ruled Friday, saying PI had not made a showing of "egregious misconduct."
-
August 24, 2016
Fairchild Still On The Hook For $140M Award, Judge Says
A California federal court on Wednesday shut down a bid for a new trial and let stand a $140 million jury award against Fairchild Semiconductor International Inc. for patent infringement, saying the company didn't even try to show how Power Integrations Inc.'s evidence was either unreliable or insufficient.
-
March 28, 2016
Power Integrations Says $140M Fairchild Award Is Proper
Power Integrations Inc. urged a California federal court to let stand a $140 million jury award against Fairchild Semiconductor International Inc. for patent infringement, saying the amount was properly calculated.
-
February 16, 2016
Fairchild Wants Fresh Look At 'Duplicative' $140M Verdict
Fairchild Semiconductor asked a California federal court Friday to throw out a jury's $139.8 million verdict against it for infringing two Power Integrations patents, arguing the jury wrongly awarded Power Integrations damages for both lost profits and royalties.
-
December 17, 2015
Calif. Jury Hands PI $140M Patent Win Against Fairchild
A California federal jury said Thursday that Fairchild Semiconductor must pay $139.8 million for infringing two power-supply patents held by Power Integrations Inc., awarding an even larger sum than a $105 million verdict that Power Integrations won last year but was later vacated by the court.
-
December 16, 2015
Fairchild Owes $140M For IP Infringement, PI Tells Jury
Power Integrations told the California federal jury overseeing its damages retrial against Fairchild Semiconductor that Fairchild must pay $140 million for infringing two power-supply patents — more than the $105 million verdict it won last year that was later vacated by the court.
-
December 14, 2015
PI Calls Some Fairchild Claims Irrelevant In IP Retrial
A jury in a damages retrial should be told to disregard Fairchild Semiconductor's claim that it purposefully stopped shipping certain products to the U.S. after learning they infringed two Power Integrations Inc. power-supply patents because the statement is irrelevant to the case, PI told a California federal court on Monday.