Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Sidibe v. Sutter Health
Case Number:
3:12-cv-04854
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Arnold & Porter
- Bartko Zankel
- Berman Tabacco
- Boies Schiller
- Bradley Arant
- Chan Punzalan
- Constantine Cannon
- Crowell & Moring
- Farmer Brownstein
- Fenton & Keller
- Gibson Dunn
- Hansen Kohls
- Hausfeld LLP
- Helton Law Group
- Holland & Knight
- Jones Day
- Keller Grover
- Kennaday Leavitt
- King & Spalding
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Mayer Brown
- Pearson Warshaw
- Pillsbury Winthrop
- Polsinelli PC
- Redgrave LLP
- Reed Smith
- Schneider Wallace
- Steyer Lowenthal
- Williams & Connolly
Companies
- Aetna Inc.
- Blue Shield of California
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
- Community Hospital of the Monterey Peninsula
- Dignity Health
- Health Net Inc.
- Intel Corp.
- John Muir Health
- Sutter Health
- Tenet Healthcare Corp.
- The Cigna Group
- Verity Health
- Woodruff-Sawyer & Co.
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
March 11, 2022
Sutter Health Defeats $411M Antitrust Class Action At Trial
A California federal jury cleared Sutter Health in a $411 million class action claiming the hospital giant used restrictive contracts with insurance companies to illegally boost prices and overcharge millions of premium-paying employers and individuals in Northern California, finding Friday that antitrust laws had not been violated.
-
March 09, 2022
Sutter Owes $411M In Antitrust Case, Jury Told At Trial's Close
Sutter Health kept its prices high through anti-competitive means and should pay 3 million insurance buyers $411 million for overcharges, their lawyer argued Wednesday at the close of a California federal antitrust trial, calling the hospital chain's contracts with insurers restrictive, "unfair," "unjust" and "illegal."
-
March 04, 2022
Jury Told Kaiser, Not Sutter, Dominates Hospital Market
A Columbia University economics professor testifying Friday as an expert for Sutter Health in a $411 million antitrust suit alleging the Northern California hospital giant overcharges for its services said the consumers' case defies "common sense" by ignoring the dominance of Kaiser Permanente in the market.
-
March 03, 2022
Sutter Antitrust Jury Hears ACA Spurred Lower-Priced Plans
A California federal jury considering a $411 million antitrust case against Sutter Health heard videotaped testimony Thursday from a former Blue Shield executive who said that brokers began asking for lower-cost insurance options about the time the Affordable Care Act was introduced.
-
February 25, 2022
Sutter Exec Pressed On COVID Care In $411M Antitrust Trial
A lawyer representing 3 million certified class members in a $411 million antitrust suit against Sutter Health over its allegedly onerous contracting provisions cross-examined one of its executives about its nursing staff shortages during the pandemic, saying his testimony on quality improvements had "opened the door" to the inquiry.
-
February 23, 2022
Sutter's Market Dominance Hiked Premiums $411M, Jury Told
An economist testifying as an expert witness in a federal antitrust class action against Sutter Health said Wednesday that the hospital giant exploited its market power over California's top five health insurers, resulting in higher prices that cost millions of premium payers about $411 million.
-
February 22, 2022
Sutter Dominated Market; Employers Wanted It, Jurors Hear
A Blue Shield executive testified Tuesday in a $411 million federal antitrust class action against Sutter that the hospital giant leveraged its dominant market position to force the insurer into costly contracts but also conceded that it worried about unhappy clients moving to other insurers if it dumped Sutter.
-
February 18, 2022
Sutter's Practices Raised Premiums For SF Workers, Jury Told
The former director of San Francisco's health service system for municipal employees testified Friday in a $411 million federal antitrust class action against Sutter Health that the hospital giant's contracting practices blocked the city and county — the second-largest employer in Northern California — from offering workers lower premiums.
-
February 17, 2022
Ex-Sutter CFO Denies Flexing Market Muscle At Antitrust Trial
Sutter Health's former chief financial officer rejected claims that the hospital giant built up its market power to stifle competition and charge higher prices, testifying Thursday in a $411 million antitrust class action that its goal is merely to have the money to fund necessary and state-mandated improvements.
-
February 16, 2022
Ex-VA Health Official Questions Sutter Costs At Antitrust Trial
A former U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs undersecretary for health under the Clinton administration testified as an expert witness Wednesday in a $411 million antitrust class action against Sutter Health, saying other hospitals get high marks for patient care without the higher prices that Sutter demands.