Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

The Official Stanford Investors Committee et al v. Greenberg Traurig, LLP et al

  1. July 18, 2016

    Hunton & Williams Says Immunity Dooms Stanford Ponzi Suit

    Hunton & Williams LLP has urged a Texas federal judge to toss a proposed investor class action alleging it and Greenberg Traurig LLP aided Robert Allen Stanford's $7 billion Ponzi scheme, arguing the firm isn't liable under state attorney immunity laws.

  2. July 07, 2016

    Greenberg Can't Ditch Stanford Ponzi Suit, Investors Say

    The receiver for R. Allen Stanford's $7 billion Ponzi scheme and a putative class of defrauded investors on Wednesday told a Texas federal court the attorney immunity doctrine doesn't protect Greenberg Traurig LLP from a suit alleging the firm helped carry out the scheme.

  3. June 16, 2016

    Greenberg Says Atty Immunity Must Halt Stanford Ponzi Suit

    Greenberg Traurig LLP on Wednesday asked a Texas federal judge to quash a proposed investor class action against the firm and Hunton & Williams LLP claiming they aided Robert Allen Stanford's $7 billion Ponzi scheme, saying recent appellate decisions show the suit is barred under the attorney immunity doctrine.

  4. February 26, 2016

    Greenberg Fights Class Cert. In Suit Over $7B Ponzi Scheme

    Greenberg Traurig LLP urged a Texas federal court Friday to deny certification of a proposed class of investors suing Greenberg and Hunton & Williams LLP for allegedly aiding Robert Allen Stanford's $7 billion Ponzi scheme, saying the class is "riddled with individualized issues."

  5. January 14, 2016

    Stanford Receiver Says Greenberg, Hunton Stalling Suit

    The receiver for Robert Allen Stanford's investment firms told a Texas federal judge Thursday that Hunton & Williams LLP and Greenberg Traurig LLP are trying to slow down a proposed class action over their roles in Stanford's Ponzi scheme by opposing a bid to split the case.

  6. December 22, 2015

    Court Sides With Greenberg, Hunton On Some Stanford Docs

    A Texas magistrate judge partially agreed Tuesday to a request from Greenberg Traurig LLP and Hunton & Williams LLP to force victims of Robert Allen Stanford's $7 billion Ponzi scheme to provide certain documents from related cases, noting many of the documents are already available.

  7. December 02, 2015

    Greenberg, Hunton Push For Docs In Stanford Victims Row

    Greenberg Traurig LLP and Hunton & Williams LLP fired back against victims of Robert Allen Stanford's $7 billion Ponzi scheme who opposed their attempts to get discovery documents from other Stanford-related cases released in current litigation, telling a federal judge on Tuesday there was no standing to refuse handing over the already-produced documents.

  8. November 18, 2015

    Stanford Victims Slam Greenberg, Hunton Discovery Bids

    Victims of Robert Allen Stanford's $7 billion Ponzi scheme told a Texas federal judge Tuesday that Greenberg Traurig and Hunton & Williams can't demand documents from other suits they themselves said were irrelevant to a class certification bid, accusing the firms of gamesmanship.

  9. July 14, 2015

    Hunton's Motion In Stanford Suit A Delay Ploy, Plaintiffs Say

    Victims of Robert Allen Stanford's $7 billion Ponzi scheme asked a Texas federal court Monday to deny Hunton & Williams LLP's motion to dismiss for failure to seek class certification in a timely manner, calling the move a mere delay tactic.

  10. June 23, 2015

    Greenberg, Hunton Say Stanford Class In Texas Is Untimely

    Hunton & Williams LLP on Tuesday urged a Texas federal court to strike claims from a pending putative class action over its role in Robert Allen Stanford's $7 billion Ponzi scheme, joining co-defendant Greenberg Traurig LLP in arguing that the plaintiffs have failed to timely move to certify a class.