Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
The Official Stanford Investors Committee et al v. Greenberg Traurig, LLP et al
Case Number:
3:12-cv-04641
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Baker Botts
- Boies Schiller
- Bradley Arant
- Butzel Long
- Castillo Snyder
- Clark Hill
- Cowles & Thompson
- Fogler Brar
- Jenner & Block
- McKool Smith
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 10, 2015
No Quick Appeal For Greenberg, Hunton In Stanford Suit
A Texas federal judge on Tuesday rejected Greenberg Traurig LLP and Hunton & Williams LLP's bid for a quick appeal of his decision preserving claims that the firms assisted Robert Allen Stanford in his $7 billion Ponzi scheme.
-
February 05, 2015
Greenberg, Hunton Can't Buck Stanford Fraud Class Action
A Texas federal judge on Wednesday kept intact the bulk of a putative class action brought by investors accusing Greenberg Traurig LLP and Hunton & Williams LLP of assisting Robert Allen Stanford in a $7 billion Ponzi scheme, saying that the investors had made the factual allegations necessary to move forward.
-
January 06, 2015
Greenberg, Hunton Say Stanford Receiver Suit Lacks Legs
Greenberg Traurig LLP and Hunton & Williams LLP urged a Texas federal court to modify its decision trimming claims in an investor row over the firms' alleged role in helping convicted Ponzi schemer Robert Allen Stanford, asking the court to certify the question of whether the receiver had standing to file the suit.
-
December 17, 2014
Ponzi Investors' Claims Trimmed Against Greenberg, Hunton
A Texas federal judge Wednesday tossed claims brought by an investors committee and receiver that Greenberg Traurig LLP and Hunton & Williams LLP breached fiduciary duty in helping convicted Ponzi schemer Robert Allen Stanford, saying the firms' continuing legal fees weren't enough of a pecuniary interest to raise the claims.
-
June 03, 2014
Greenberg, Hunton Can't Hide Behind Immunity, Court Told
A class of investors accusing Greenberg Traurig LLP and Hunton & Williams LLP of aiding convicted Ponzi schemer Robert Allen Stanford on Monday pushed back against bids to quash their $1.8 billion action, saying Texas' attorney qualified immunity doctrine does not apply to this case.
-
November 16, 2012
Stanford Investors Drop $1.8B Suit On Greenberg, Hunton
A class of investors in the doomed Ponzi scheme of Robert Allen Stanford on Thursday demanded $1.8 billion in damages from Greenberg Traurig LLP, Hunton & Williams LLP and a former Greenberg attorney for helping the convicted fraudster pull off his misdeeds.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next →