Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
April 02, 2013
In re: NeuroGrafix ('360) Patent Litigation
Case Number:
1:13-md-02432
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Barnes & Thornburg
- Birnbaum & Godkin
- Callahan Law Group
- Foley Hoag
- Fox Rothschild
- Knobbe Martens
- Lewis Rice
- Mayer Brown
- Milberg Coleman
- Nutter McClennen
- Renner Otto
- Russ August & Kabat
- Shook Hardy
- Swiggart & Agin
- Tensor Law
- Todd & Weld
- Tucker Ellis
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
June 20, 2018
Apology For 'Overheated Rhetoric' Can't Revive Patent Suit
A California attorney who recently apologized for inserting "overheated rhetoric" against his opposing counsel in a motion to revive a patent infringement lawsuit could not make up for a lack of evidence in the case centered on an expired license for MRI imaging, a Massachusetts federal judge ruled Wednesday.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login