Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
May 17, 2013
Hughes v. Accretive Health, Inc. et al
Case Number:
1:13-cv-03688
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Benesch
- Clark Hill
- Glancy Prongay
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Latham & Watkins
- Pomerantz LLP
- Quinn Emanuel
- Winston & Strawn
Companies
- Credit Suisse Group AG
- JPMorgan Chase & Co.
- Morgan Stanley
- R1 RCM Inc.
- Robert W. Baird & Co. Inc.
- William Blair & Co. LLC
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
September 26, 2014
'Puzzle Pleading' Kills Accretive Shareholder Complaint
An Illinois federal judge on Thursday tossed an Accretive Health Inc. shareholder derivative suit alleging the hospital billing company overstated its financial statements for nine quarters, blasting the plaintiff's use of confusing "puzzle pleading" in the complaint.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login