Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Updates
- Law360 Podcasts
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Rankings
- Data-Driven Lawyers
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Glass Ceiling Report
- Global 20
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Site Menu
- Join the Law360 team
- Search legal jobs
- Learn more about Law360
- Read testimonials
- Contact Law360
- Sign up for our newsletters
- Site Map
- Help
Radware, LTD. et al v. A10 Networks, Inc.
Case Number:
5:13-cv-02021
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 02, 2014
Network Cos. Say Radware Load-Balance Patents Invalid
Two computer networking companies urged a California federal judge on Friday to throw out Radware Ltd.'s lawsuits accusing them of infringing three patents on network load balancing, arguing that the patents are invalid because their language improperly mixes patent claims or is unclear.
-
March 06, 2014
Irell & Manella DQ'd In Patent Row Over Client Conflict
A California federal judge on Wednesday disqualified Irell & Manella LLP from representing networking equipment supplier A10 Networks Inc. in a patent infringement case brought by Radware Ltd., ruling that Irell's work on behalf of Radware in a prior suit presents a conflict.