Adaptix, Inc. v. AT&T, Inc. et al

  1. July 24, 2015

    Fed. Circ. Brief Can Be Used To Fight Fee Bid, Adaptix Says

    Adaptix Inc. told a California federal court Thursday that Apple Inc., Verizon Wireless and others "shot themselves in the foot" by including a Federal Circuit brief as an exhibit in an attorneys' fees motion in cases accusing them of infringing two data-encoding patents, making use of the brief's contents fair game in its opposition.

  2. April 07, 2015

    Apple, AT&T, VZW Seek 'Exceptional' Fees In Adaptix IP Row

    Apple Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC and Verizon Wireless urged a California federal judge Tuesday to award them attorneys' fees in Adaptix Inc.'s cases accusing them of infringing two data-encoding patents, arguing Adaptix's numerous baseless lawsuits make the cases exceptional under the U.S. Supreme Court's Octane ruling.

  3. January 26, 2015

    Adaptix Patents In Apple, AT&T, Verizon Suits Ruled Invalid

    A California federal magistrate judge on Friday ruled that claims of two Adaptix Inc. data encoding patents are invalid due to indefiniteness, a week after ruling that Apple Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, Verizon Wireless and HTC Corp. did not directly infringe the patents.

  4. November 04, 2014

    Adaptix Says No Evidence Its Patents Used AT&T Secrets

    Adaptix Inc. urged a California federal judge to rule that two data-encoding patents it accuses Apple Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC of infringing are valid, arguing Tuesday that the defendants lack convincing evidence that a handful of AT&T engineers defected to Adaptix and essentially handed it the inventions.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!