Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Adaptix, Inc. v. AT&T, Inc. et al
Case Number:
5:13-cv-01778
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Akin Gump
- Blank Rome
- Bunsow De Mory
- Cadwalader Wickersham
- GBG LLP
- Hayes Messina
- Mintz Levin
- Orrick Herrington
- Perkins Coie
- Potter Minton
- Prince Lobel
- Williams Simons
- WilmerHale
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 24, 2015
Fed. Circ. Brief Can Be Used To Fight Fee Bid, Adaptix Says
Adaptix Inc. told a California federal court Thursday that Apple Inc., Verizon Wireless and others "shot themselves in the foot" by including a Federal Circuit brief as an exhibit in an attorneys' fees motion in cases accusing them of infringing two data-encoding patents, making use of the brief's contents fair game in its opposition.
-
April 07, 2015
Apple, AT&T, VZW Seek 'Exceptional' Fees In Adaptix IP Row
Apple Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC and Verizon Wireless urged a California federal judge Tuesday to award them attorneys' fees in Adaptix Inc.'s cases accusing them of infringing two data-encoding patents, arguing Adaptix's numerous baseless lawsuits make the cases exceptional under the U.S. Supreme Court's Octane ruling.
-
January 26, 2015
Adaptix Patents In Apple, AT&T, Verizon Suits Ruled Invalid
A California federal magistrate judge on Friday ruled that claims of two Adaptix Inc. data encoding patents are invalid due to indefiniteness, a week after ruling that Apple Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, Verizon Wireless and HTC Corp. did not directly infringe the patents.
-
November 04, 2014
Adaptix Says No Evidence Its Patents Used AT&T Secrets
Adaptix Inc. urged a California federal judge to rule that two data-encoding patents it accuses Apple Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC of infringing are valid, arguing Tuesday that the defendants lack convincing evidence that a handful of AT&T engineers defected to Adaptix and essentially handed it the inventions.