Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
In re: North Sea Brent Crude Oil Futures Litigation
Case Number:
1:13-md-02475
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action, Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Arnold & Porter
- Berger Montague
- Cadwalader Wickersham
- Cafferty Clobes
- Cera LLP
- Cohen Milstein
- DiCello Levitt
- Dimond Kaplan
- Edwards Kirby
- Gibson Dunn
- Glancy Prongay
- Kirby McInerney
- Lieff Cabraser
- Lockridge Grindal
- Lovell Stewart
- Lowey Dannenberg
- Morgan Lewis
- Motley Rice
- Neufeld Scheck
- Pomerantz LLP
- Quinn Emanuel
- Robbins Geller
- Robins Kaplan
- Safirstein Law
- Sidley Austin
- Skadden Arps
- Stroock & Stroock
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Vinson & Elkins
- Weinstein Kitchenoff
- WilmerHale
- Winston & Strawn
- Zwerling Schachter
Companies
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 07, 2015
Shell Subsidiaries Want Oil Price-Rigging Suit Dumped
Two Royal Dutch Shell PLC affiliates on Tuesday urged a New York federal court to dismiss them from a multidistrict litigation accusing them of manipulating crude oil futures, arguing that the plaintiffs haven't alleged facts to justify the affiliates being named in the suit.
-
July 29, 2014
BP, Shell Blast Class's Crude Oil Manipulation Claims
Morgan Stanley, Royal Dutch Shell PLC and others asked a New York federal to toss a consolidated class action in multidistrict litigation accusing them of manipulating crude oil futures, arguing that the plaintiffs can't point to specific antitrust conduct to back their claims.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next →