Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Rockstar Consortium US LP et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD., et al
Case Number:
2:13-cv-00900
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 02, 2015
Rockstar Settles With Samsung Over Search-Engine Patent
Rockstar Consortium US LP Inc. on Friday agreed to settle litigation brought against Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. in Texas federal court, resolving one of the company's suits against cellphone companies that accuse them of infringing its patents by making and selling mobile devices using Google Inc.'s Android operating system.
-
July 21, 2014
Google Can't Shake Rockstar Search-Engine Patent Suit
A Texas federal judge on Monday refused to toss Rockstar Consortium US LP Inc.'s suit accusing cellphone companies of infringing seven of its patents by making and selling mobile devices using Google Inc.'s Android operating system, ruling Rockstar's claims are sufficiently specific.
-
May 15, 2014
Samsung Fails To Unseat Rockstar IP Suit
A Texas federal judge on Thursday refused to dismiss Rockstar Consortium US LP Inc.'s suit alleging Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. infringed seven of its patents by making and selling mobile devices using Google Inc.'s Android operating system, finding that Rockstar's subsidiary doesn't lack standing to sue.