Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
November 18, 2013
IN RE: FANNIE MAE/FREDDIE MAC SENIOR PREFERRED STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT CLASS ACTION LITIGATIONS
Case Number:
1:13-mc-01288
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action, Derivative Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Arnold & Porter
- Bancroft PLLC
- Bernstein Litowitz
- Boies Schiller
- Covington & Burling
- Dhillon Law Group
- Foley & Lardner
- Glancy Prongay
- Grant & Eisenhofer
- Guttman Buschner
- Kessler Topaz
- King & Spalding
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Lowey Dannenberg
- Mehri & Skalet
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Pomerantz LLP
Companies
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
June 02, 2023
Fannie Investors Scolded For Bid To Reopen Expert Discovery
A D.C. federal judge Friday denied renewed requests from Fannie Mae shareholders to reopen expert discovery and pursue reliance damages in their retrial accusing the Federal Housing Finance Agency of improperly amending stock purchase agreements after the 2008 financial crisis, lamenting, "Some parties just won't take no for an answer."
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login