January 14, 2014

Toyo Tire & Rubber Co., Ltd. et al v. Hong Kong Tri-Ace Tire Co., Ltd. et al

Track this case

Case Number:

8:14-cv-00054

Court:

California Central

Nature of Suit:

Patent

Judge:

Cormac J. Carney

Firms

View recent docket activity


Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.


Coverage

  1. December 19, 2017

    Toyo Seeks $300K In Fees After $1.6M Contempt Sanction

    Toyo Tire & Rubber asked a California federal court Monday to approve over $300,000 in attorneys' fees and costs after ruling two Chinese companies must pay $1.6 million for violating a judgment barring them from making and selling tires that are “confusingly similar” in appearance to a Toyo tire.

5 other articles on this case. View all »

Parties

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Direct access to case information and documents.
  • All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
  • Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
  • No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS