Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Intellectual Ventures I LLC et al v. Capital One Financial Corporation et al

  1. January 02, 2018

    Capital One Seeks To Revive Banking-Tech Monopoly Claims

    Capital One Financial Corp. has given notice that it will ask the Federal Circuit to revive counterclaims nixed in Maryland federal court in late November that accused Intellectual Ventures I LLC of monopolizing the banking technology market with a vast patent portfolio and infringement accusations.

  2. August 11, 2017

    IV Can't Skirt Antitrust Counterclaims, Capital One Says

    Capital One Financial Corp. on Thursday urged a Maryland federal court not to end its counterclaims accusing Intellectual Ventures I LLC of monopolizing the banking technology market in violation of the Clayton and Sherman acts.

  3. September 04, 2015

    Judge Nixes 2 Intellectual Ventures Patents Under Alice

    A Maryland federal judge has held that two mobile banking patents being asserted by Intellectual Ventures I LLC against Capital One Financial Corp. in a patent infringement and antitrust case are invalid as they claim abstract ideas under the U.S. Supreme Court's Alice standard.

  4. August 25, 2015

    Capital One Says Intellectual Ventures Discovery Must Go On

    Capital One Financial Corp., which is embroiled in a patent infringement and antitrust case with Intellectual Ventures LLC, urged a Maryland federal court to reject the patent holding company's bid to overturn a special master's order that it provide information regarding its competitors in the financial services patent licensing market.

  5. May 27, 2015

    Capital One Redoubles Efforts In Intellectual Ventures Beef

    A special master erred by finding two of Intellectual Ventures I LLC's mobile banking patents legitimate, Capital One Financial Corp. contended Tuesday, in a dual filing where it also argued against a dismissal of its antitrust counterclaims against IV.

  6. May 12, 2015

    Intellectual Ventures Banking Patents Survive Alice Test

    A special master determined Tuesday that two mobile banking patents held by Intellectual Ventures LLC are legitimate, recommending that a Maryland federal court dismiss arguments filed in the infringement and antitrust case by defendant Capital One Financial Corp.

  7. March 02, 2015

    Capital One Can Pursue Intellectual Ventures In Antitrust Case

    A Maryland federal judge on Monday allowed Capital One Financial Corp. to pursue antitrust counterclaims in Intellectual Ventures LLC's mobile banking patent infringement suit, ruling the bank sufficiently alleged Intellectual Ventures cornered the market for financial services patents.

  8. February 20, 2015

    Intellectual Ventures Says Capital One Can't Ax IP With Alice

    Intellectual Ventures LLC pushed back against Capital One Financial Corp.'s bid to invalidate several mobile banking patents in an infringement suit because they allegedly deal with nothing more than abstract ideas as defined by the U.S. Supreme Court's Alice decision, arguing Thursday the patents are patent eligible.

  9. January 22, 2015

    Capital One Says Alice Dooms Intellectual Ventures IP Suit

    Capital One Financial Corp. has urged a Maryland federal judge to toss patent infringement claims from Intellectual Ventures LLC, arguing that all of the patents at issue are invalid because they deal with nothing more than abstract ideas as defined by the U.S. Supreme Court's Alice decision.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!