Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
March 10, 2014
DSS Technology Management Inc. v. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. et al
Case Number:
2:14-cv-00199
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Bruster PLLC
- Chin Law Firm PLLC
- Egan Enders
- Gillam Smith
- Haynes & Boone
- Jones Day
- Nix Patterson
- Orrick Herrington
- Perkins Coie
- Potter Minton
- Ropes & Gray
- Ward Smith
- Weil Gotshal
Companies
- MediaTek Inc.
- NEC Corp.
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
- Xilinx Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
October 13, 2016
Samsung Denied Atty Fees After DSS Patent Win At Fed. Circ.
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. failed to convince a Texas federal judge it deserved more than $2 million in attorneys' fees from DSS Technology Management over the pursuit of a semiconductor patent infringement suit, when the magistrate held Wednesday the case is not exceptional under Octane Fitness.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login