Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
In re: Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
1:14-md-02542
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action, Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Kirkland & Ellis
- K&L Gates
- Weinstein Kitchenoff
- Robbins Geller
- Ahern & Associates
- Arthur N. Bailey & Associates
- Saxena White
- Spiro Harrison
- Skadden Arps
- Nelson Mullins
- McGuireWoods
- Davis Wright Tremaine
- Gustafson Gluek
- Cadwalader Wickersham
- Cleary Gottlieb
- Lovelace & Associates PA
- Gross & Belsky
- Girard Sharp
- Jones Day
- Garwin Gerstein
- Lockridge Grindal
- Pritzker Levine
- Motley Rice
- Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko
- Harrington Ocko
- Hunton Andrews
- Stinson LLP
- Butzel Long
- Bartko Pavia
- Faruqi & Faruqi
- Shinder Cantor
- Jones Foster
- Pearson Warshaw
- Segal McCambridge
- Buchanan Ingersoll
- Pomerantz LLP
- Robins Kaplan
- George Feldman
- Nussbaum Law Group
- McKool Smith
- Kaplan Fox
- Scott&Scott
- Mitchell Williams
- Jaeckle Fleischmann
- Gainey McKenna
- Mehri & Skalet
- Morgan Lewis
- Wolf Haldenstein
- Cotchett Pitre
- Paul Weiss
- Lowey Dannenberg
- Steven Williams Law
- Taus Cebulash
- Winston & Strawn
- Berman Tabacco
- Wolf Popper
- Butler Snow LLP
- Kehoe Law
- Miller Shah
- Zaremba Brown
- Duane Morris
- Troutman
- Alston & Bird
- Polsinelli PC
- Quarles & Brady
- Orrick Herrington
- Oliver Bell Group
- Dan Johnson Law Group
- Grant & Eisenhofer
- Mayer Brown
Companies
- Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
- R.C. Bigelow Inc.
- Nestle SA
- Tekni-Plex Inc.
- Essendant Inc.
- Costco Wholesale Corp.
- Community Coffee Co. LLC
- Costco
- Bay Valley Foods LLC
- McLane Co. Inc.
- Bi-Lo
- BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings Inc.
- Compass Group PLC
- Wakefern Food Corp.
- Walmart Inc.
- TreeHouse Foods Inc.
- Unilever PLC
- The ODP Corp.
- Compass Minerals International, Inc.
- Dunkin' Brands Group Inc.
- Peet’s Coffee Inc.
- Starbucks Corp.
- Flint Group SA
- Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.
- Amazon.com Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 09, 2015
Keurig Says K-Cup Buyers Lack Standing In Monopoly Row
Keurig Green Mountain Inc. sought Thursday to cut claims that monopolist practices forced K-Cup buyers to overpay for caffeine fixes from a sprawling antitrust action, arguing that competitors like TreeHouse Foods Inc. and Rogers Family Co. Inc. are its actual litigation adversaries and that so-called direct and indirect purchasers lack standing.
-
May 12, 2015
Keurig Fights To Toss Buyers' Claims From Antitrust MDL
Keurig Green Mountain Inc. told the New York federal judge overseeing the consolidated litigation over the company's alleged anti-competitive practices that plaintiffs who bought K-cup coffee pods directly from the company can't bring antitrust claims against it.
-
April 14, 2015
Coffee Cos. Look To Keep Keurig Antitrust Claims Alive
Coffee companies fought to keep alive antitrust suits brought against Keurig Green Mountain Inc. over its single-cup brewing machine, telling a New York federal judge on Monday that the K-Cup coffee pod maker can't make a compelling case for dismissal.
-
September 25, 2014
Coffee Co. To Appeal Injunction Loss In Keurig MDL
Rogers Family Co. Inc. said on Wednesday that it would appeal a New York federal judge's refusal to block Keurig Green Mountain Inc. from selling the latest version of its popular brewing machine despite claims that the new brewer would lock in Keurig's "K-Cup" monopoly.
-
September 19, 2014
Keurig Can Sell 2.0 Brewer During Antitrust MDL, Judge Says
A New York federal judge on Friday rejected a bid to block Keurig Green Mountain Inc. from selling the latest version of its popular brewing machine because it was allegedly designed to expand a single-serving monopoly, saying the plaintiff didn't show it would suffer irreparably without an injunction.
-
September 03, 2014
Coffeemaker Roasts Keurig 2.0 Machine In Antitrust MDL
An attorney for a California coffee company on Wednesday urged a New York federal judge to block Keurig Inc. from selling the latest version of its popular brewing machine, arguing it was designed to expand a monopoly in the single-serving market.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next →