Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Indiezone, Inc., et al v. Todd Rooke, et al
Case Number:
14-16895
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 13, 2018
9th Circ. Botched Sanctions Ruling, Startup Argues
Indiezone Inc. asked the Ninth Circuit on Tuesday to rethink its decision that a lower court correctly sanctioned the startup and its lawyer for bringing a "sham" company into its case alleging that former employees conspired to steal its $1 billion e-commerce processing software.
-
November 16, 2017
Startup Tells 9th Circ. $1B IP Holder Not A 'Sham' Co.
Startup Indiezone Inc. told the Ninth Circuit on Thursday that a lower court erred in sanctioning it and its lawyer for bringing a "sham" company into its case alleging former employees conspired to steal its $1 billion e-commerce processing software, saying new evidence showed the co-plaintiff was legitimate.