Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
ALARMAX DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Case Number:
2:14-cv-01527
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Buchanan Ingersoll
- Fowkes Rodkey
- Kelley Drye
- K&L Gates
- Marshall Dennehey
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Pietragallo Gordon
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
November 15, 2019
AlarMax, Honeywell Settle Price Discrimination Suit
A Pittsburgh security company's long-running dispute with Honeywell International Inc. appeared to have reached a settlement, after a mediator announced the case was resolved Thursday and a Pennsylvania federal court closed the case Friday, court records showed.
-
October 13, 2017
Honeywell Antitrust Lawsuit Headed To Mediation
A Pennsylvania federal magistrate judge on Friday referred to mediation a price discrimination and breach of contract lawsuit against Honeywell International Inc. brought by a security products competitor alleging violation of a decade-old agreement, ordering the costs to be split between both companies.
-
March 08, 2017
Honeywell Denied Sanctions, Rebuked For Spying On Rival
A Pennsylvania federal judge on Wednesday denied Honeywell International Inc.'s bid for sanctions against AlarMax Distributors Inc. in a price discrimination and breach of contract suit and barred the company from engaging in any further surveillance of individuals associated with the security products distributor.
-
February 08, 2017
Honeywell Seeks Sanctions In Rival's Antitrust Suit
Honeywell International Inc. urged a Pennsylvania federal judge on Tuesday to sanction a rival security products distributor in a price discrimination and breach of contract suit, saying the distributor misrepresented its president's health to delay litigation and he was recently spotted socializing at several area cigar bars.
-
January 07, 2015
Honeywell Wants Alarm Distributor's Antitrust Suit Tossed
Honeywell International Inc. on Wednesday blasted a price discrimination and breach of contract suit brought by a rival alleging violation of a decade-old settlement and supply agreement related to fire and security products, telling a Pennsylvania federal judge the allegations lacked specifics.