BAE Systems Technology Solution & Services, Inc. v. Republic of Korea's Defense Acquisition Program Administration

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

8:14-cv-03551

Court:

Maryland

Nature of Suit:

Contract: Other

Judge:

Paul W. Grimm

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. December 08, 2016

    Korea's F-16 Contract Beef Is With US, Not BAE, Judge Says

    A Maryland federal judge threw out South Korean government claims Wednesday accusing BAE Systems Inc. of not keeping pricing promises for an F-16 fleet upgrade project, concluding the nature of the deal through the U.S. government prevents contract breach claims against the company doing the work.

  2. July 18, 2016

    Korea Blocked From Pursuing BAE In Its Own Courts

    A Maryland federal judge took the possibly unprecedented step Monday of temporarily enjoining the South Korean government from pursuing BAE Systems Inc. in its own courts while litigation over whether the country's underlying arms agreement with the U.S. forecloses private suits plays out in the United States.

  3. February 04, 2016

    Korea Can't Duck $43M BAE Suit Over Nixed F-16 Contract

    A Maryland federal court Thursday said South Korea must face defense contractor BAE's $43 million suit concerning a canceled radar upgrade for the country's F-16 fighter jet fleet, rejecting the country's arguments that the case did not belong in Maryland.

  4. November 14, 2014

    BAE Fights $43M Claim Over Nixed S. Korean F-16 Contract

    A BAE Systems PLC unit has hit the South Korean government with a complaint in Maryland federal court, claiming the company doesn't owe South Korea payment of a $43 million bond for a U.S. Air Force contract recently canceled by the country.