Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Rankings
- Data-Driven Lawyers
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Glass Ceiling Report
- Global 20
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Site Menu
- Join the Law360 team
- Search legal jobs
- Learn more about Law360
- Read testimonials
- Contact Law360
- Sign up for our newsletters
- Site Map
- Help
We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close
November 25, 2014
IN RE PLATINUM AND PALLADIUM ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Case Number:
1:14-cv-09391
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Boies Schiller
- Clifford Chance
- Cotchett Pitre
- Dechert
- Freshfields
- Gibson Dunn
- Glancy Prongay
- Goodwin
- Grabar Law Office
- Hughes Hubbard
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Labaton Sucharow
- Lockridge Grindal
- Sullivan & Cromwell
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
March 29, 2017
Traders' Platinum And Palladium Antitrust Suit Trimmed
A New York federal judge trimmed most of the defendants and claims from a proposed class action alleging several banks conspired to deflate the market value of platinum and palladium, ruling Tuesday that several of the banks weren’t subject to U.S. jurisdiction and that the proposed stockholder class was too broad to have antitrust standing.
Parties
To view the parties, register now.
Try Law360 FREE for seven days
Already a subscriber? Click here to login