Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Stadnick v. Vivint Solar, Inc. et al
Case Number:
1:14-cv-09709
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
- Bank of America Corp.
- Barclays PLC
- Citigroup Inc.
- Credit Suisse Group AG
- Deutsche Bank AG
- Morgan Stanley
- Vivint Solar Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
-
December 11, 2015
Vivint Solar 'Flawed' Shareholder IPO Suit Tossed
A New York federal judge on Thursday tossed a shareholder lawsuit alleging that The Blackstone Group LP-backed Vivint Solar Inc. inflated the value of its $330 million initial public offering, calling the suit's premise "fundamentally flawed."
-
March 05, 2015
Vivint Solar Says Investors Weren't Misled Before $330M IPO
Counsel for The Blackstone Group LP-backed Vivint Solar Inc. cataloged the potential grounds to dismiss shareholder allegations that the renewable energy provider inflated the value of its $330 million initial public offering, telling a New York federal judge on Thursday the company disclosed all the relevant financial information.
-
December 10, 2014
Stockholders Claim Vivint Solar's $330M IPO Misled Investors
Shareholders hit Blackstone Group LP-backed renewable energy provider Vivint Solar Inc. with a class action Tuesday in New York federal court, alleging the company inflated the value of its $330 million initial public offering through misleading statements, events that preceded a plunge in stock price.