Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
King County v Travelers Indemnity Company et al
Case Number:
2:14-cv-01957
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Betts Patterson
- Carney Badley
- Clausen Miller
- Cozen O'Connor
- Craig & Winkelman
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
- Duane Morris
- Forsberg & Umlauf
- Gordon Rees
- Gordon Thomas Honeywell
- Hinshaw & Culbertson
- Karbal Cohen
- K&L Gates
- Lane Powell
- McNaul Ebel
- Nicoll Black
- Quinn Emanuel
- Selman Leichenger
- Soha & Lang
- Wilson Smith Cochran
Companies
- Aetna Inc.
- Affiliated FM Insurance Co.
- American Home Assurance Co.
- Armour Group Holdings Ltd.
- Arrowpoint Capital
- Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
- CNA Financial Corp.
- Crum & Forster Holdings Corp.
- Great American Insurance Co.
- Lexington Insurance Co.
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Group
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.
- Old Republic Insurance Co.
- Safeco Insurance Co.
- The Hartford Financial Services Group Inc.
- The Travelers Cos. Inc.
- Zurich Insurance Group AG
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 11, 2018
AIG Units Freed From Wash. County Superfund Coverage Row
A Washington federal judge on Monday ruled that two AIG excess insurers are not obligated to cover King County's costs in connection with state and federal enforcement actions over environmental pollution at a Seattle-area Superfund site, holding that the insurers' duties were extinguished by a previous settlement with the county.
-
February 14, 2017
Insurers Must Defend Wash. County In Superfund Actions
A Washington federal judge has ruled that Travelers and two other insurers breached their duty to defend King County in state and federal enforcement actions over environmental pollution at a pair of Seattle-area Superfund sites, holding that the actions constitute "suits" triggering the insurers' obligations.