Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
February 05, 2015
Lucido v. Nestle Purina Pet Care Company
Case Number:
3:15-cv-00569
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Edelman Combs
- Law Offices of S. Chandler Visher
- Mayer Brown
- Merrill Nomura
- Pastor Law Office
- Robins Kaplan
- Ruberry Stalmack
- Terrell Marshall
- Whatley Kallas
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
November 17, 2016
Purina Dodges Consumers' Beneful Dog Food Dispute
Nestle Purina PetCare Co. escaped litigation contending that its Beneful dry food killed dogs or made them seriously ill after a California federal judge held Thursday that a proposed class of pet owners didn't prove that the product was unsafe, explaining that their allegations heavily relied on a veterinarian's inadmissible opinions.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login