Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Aeros Aeronautical Systems Corp v. United States of America et al
Case Number:
2:15-cv-01712
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
-
June 27, 2017
Feds OK'd To Reopen Evidence In $65M Blimp Damage Suit
A California federal judge has granted the government's request to reopen evidence from the testimony of Aeros Aeronautical Systems Corp.'s chief financial officer in a suit over damages to an experimental blimp caused by the collapse of a Navy hangar.
-
March 09, 2017
Navy Denied Sanctions In $65M Blimp Damage Suit
A California federal judge has rejected the U.S. Navy's request for terminating sanctions in a $65 million dispute with a contractor over an airplane hangar collapse, saying the government's sealed motion merely repeated claims made in an ex parte filing rejected by the court in May.
-
June 21, 2016
Navy Must Face $65M Blimp Loss Row, Judge Says
The U.S. Navy can't duck a suit claiming that it neglected an airplane hangar that ultimately collapsed and caused $65 million worth of damage to a contractor's blimp, a California federal judge ruled on Monday, saying that the terms of a contract don't insulate the Navy from all liability.
-
May 31, 2016
Navy Says Contract Should Nix $65M Blimp Loss Row
The U.S. Navy doubled down on its attempt to nix a suit claiming the collapse of a Marine Corps hangar destroyed an Aeros Aeronautical Systems blimp, maintaining in a California federal court filing Friday that the terms of the lease prevent the suit — even if the Navy was actually negligent.
-
May 17, 2016
Aero Co. Rips Navy Bid To Dodge $65M Suit Over Blimp Loss
Aeros Aeronautical Systems on Monday fought the U.S. Navy's bid to get out from under a lawsuit claiming it neglected an airplane hangar that ultimately collapsed and caused $65 million worth of damage to an Aeros blimp, telling a California federal court that the contract clause to which the government has pointed to avoid liability is unenforceable.
-
April 13, 2016
Blimp Co. Says Navy Owes It Over Hangar Roof Collapse
Aeros Aeronautical Systems Corp. sought a decisive win in California federal court on Tuesday over a hangar roof collapse that the company says was completely the U.S. Navy's fault and for which it claims the military branch owes it for $65 million worth of damage caused to a ruined airship.
-
March 28, 2016
Navy Denies Blame For Big Blimp Damage In Hangar Collapse
The U.S. Navy has asked a California federal court to dismiss a lawsuit that claims it neglected an airplane hangar that ultimately collapsed and caused $65 million worth of damage to a contractor's blimp, saying the litigation is barred by language in the company's agreement with the Navy.
-
November 24, 2015
Gov't Can't Use Misrepresentation To Evade $65M Blimp Row
The government can't evade a contractor's claims over a ruined $65 million blimp simply by cloaking a failure to repair the craft's hangar with a failure to warn about the facility's state of repair, a California federal judge ruled Tuesday.
-
November 03, 2015
Navy Hiding Negligence In $65M Blimp's Ruin, Contractor Says
Aeros Aeronautical Systems Corp. asked a California federal court Monday to reject the government's attempts to nix the contractor's claims the U.S. Navy negligently destroyed a $65 million blimp, saying the government continues to cloak that negligence as a lack of warning.
-
September 30, 2015
Gov't Says It's Not Liable For Destroyed $65M Blimp
The U.S. government called on a California federal court Tuesday to throw out a lawsuit over the destruction of a $65 million blimp, arguing it isn't liable after the roof of a U.S. Navy hangar collapsed.