Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

March 12, 2015

Antman, et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Track this case

Case Number:

3:15-cv-01175

Court:

California Northern

Nature of Suit:

Other Fraud

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Laurel Beeler

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

View recent docket activity

Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.

Coverage

  1. July 13, 2018

    Uber Fights Atty Fees Bid In Drivers' Failed Data Breach Suit

    Uber Inc. has told a California federal judge that attorneys' fees were inappropriate for the counsel representing two former drivers in a failed class action over a 2014 data breach at the company, arguing that the drivers hadn't succeeded in the case and that the court lacked jurisdiction over it.

16 other articles on this case. View all »

Parties

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Direct access to case information and documents.
  • All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
  • Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
  • No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

View the parties now

Already a subscriber? Click here to login