Musclepharm Corporation v. Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.

  1. August 04, 2016

    Liberty Off Hook For MusclePharm's $3M Indemnity Claim

    A Colorado federal judge on Thursday tossed MusclePharm Corp.'s coverage suit against a Liberty Insurance unit in which it sought $3 million to cover costs stemming from a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission investigation, saying the agency's probe did not allege a "wrongful act" as required by the policy.

  2. February 26, 2016

    MusclePharm Says Insurer Ignored Policy In Coverage Denial

    MusclePharm Corp. told a Colorado federal judge Thursday that its dispute with a Liberty Insurance unit over coverage of $3 million in costs related to a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission investigation deserves a quick end because its insurer is ignoring the plain terms of its policy.

  3. February 09, 2016

    MusclePharm Says Liberty Unquestionably Owes For SEC Probe

    MusclePharm Corp. told a Colorado federal judge on Monday that its policy from Liberty Insurance Underwriters Inc. "could not more clearly cover" costs stemming from a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission investigation into the sports nutrition company, resisting a motion for summary judgment.

  4. February 04, 2016

    Liberty Says MusclePharm's $3M Indemnity Suit Won't Fly

    A Liberty Insurance unit on Wednesday told a Colorado federal judge that sports nutrition company MusclePharm is rewriting the scope of its policy to try to obtain coverage for $3 million in costs of complying with a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission investigation.

  5. January 14, 2016

    Liberty Fights $3M Coverage For MusclePharm SEC Probe

    A Liberty Mutual unit told a Colorado federal judge Wednesday that it doesn't owe sports nutrition company MusclePharm $3 million for the costs of complying with a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission investigation because its coverage obligation didn't kick in until the supplement maker's executives received official notices of impending legal action.