Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Nike, Inc. v. Adidas AG
Case Number:
14-1719
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 11, 2016
4 Lessons From Fed. Circ.'s Nike Patent Amendment Ruling
A Federal Circuit decision Thursday ordering the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to reconsider its denial of Nike's motion to amend its patent in America Invents Act review is a first for the court and provides guidance for patent owners on how to appeal such denials. Here are four things attorneys can learn from the opinion.
-
February 11, 2016
Fed. Circ. Gives Nike New Shot At AIA Shoe Patent Amendment
The Federal Circuit ordered the Patent Trial and Appeal Board on Thursday to reconsider a decision denying Nike's motion to amend a footwear patent in an inter partes review, giving the company another chance to save part of its patent from a challenge by rival Adidas.
-
October 08, 2015
Nike Asks Fed. Circ. To Ax 'Obvious' Ruling In Adidas IP Fight
Nike told a Federal Circuit panel Thursday that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board was wrong to scrap its bid to tweak a patent for running shoe technology that Adidas has challenged, arguing the new claims are not an "obvious" retread of prior art.