Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
HsingChing Hsu v. Puma Biotechnology, Inc. et al
Case Number:
8:15-cv-00865
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Cooley LLP
- Glancy Prongay
- Latham & Watkins
- Mintz Levin
- Morgan Lewis
- Pomerantz LLP
- Robbins Geller
- Rosen Law Firm PA
- WilmerHale
Companies
- Bank of America Corp.
- Citigroup Inc.
- Gilardi & Company LLC
- JPMorgan Chase & Co.
- Leerink Partners LLC
- Pfizer Inc.
- Puma Biotechnology Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 04, 2022
Robbins Geller Nabs $13.5M In Puma Biotech Investor Suit
A California federal judge has granted lawyers with Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP more than $13.5 million in attorney fees along with final approval for a $54.2 million settlement for investors who alleged Puma Biotechnology Inc. misstated the effectiveness of a breast cancer treatment.
-
December 14, 2021
Puma Biotech Investors Ink $54M Deal Over Drug Statements
Investors alleging that Puma Biotechnology Inc. misstated the effectiveness of a breast cancer treatment, causing the biopharmaceutical company's share price to drop, asked a California federal judge Monday to preliminarily approve a $54.2 million proposed settlement, telling the judge the deal represents a complete recovery for the class.
-
July 29, 2019
Puma Biotech Says Liability Still Unsettled In Stock-Drop Row
Puma Biotechnology Inc. told a California federal judge last week that investors who scored a partial jury win on stock-drop claims are trying to breeze past the fact that the jury's verdict didn't resolve liability or damages.
-
February 05, 2019
Puma Biotech Misled Investors About Cancer Trial, Jury Says
A California federal jury has determined that Puma Biotechnology Inc. made misrepresentations in one of four contested statements about the results of a clinical trial involving a breast cancer treatment, awarding investors damages worth $4.50 per share.
-
January 23, 2018
Video-Averse Plaintiffs' Atty Has Been Abusive, Puma Says
Attorneys representing Puma Biotechnology Inc. in a class action suit brought by investors told the court Monday that it should allow them to film an attorney for the investors during a deposition of Puma's CEO, saying the attorney had been "disrespectful, unprofessional and abusive" in past depositions.
-
January 17, 2018
Puma Biotech Investors Say Depo Camera Is Meant To Harass
Camera-shy lawyers representing Puma Biotechnology Inc. investors on Tuesday asked a California federal judge to block a Latham & Watkins LLP defense team from training a video camera on them at an upcoming deposition.
-
December 11, 2017
Puma Biotech Investor Class Certified In Stock Drop Case
A California federal judge on Friday granted class certification to Puma Biotechnologies Inc. investors in a stock drop suit accusing the company of misrepresenting the effectiveness of a breast cancer treatment called neratinib.
-
July 26, 2017
Cancer-Drug Maker Loses 2nd Bid To Duck Stock-Drop Suit
A California federal judge on Tuesday rejected a biotechnology company's request to dismiss an updated securities fraud lawsuit against it over allegedly misleading results in a clinical trial for its cancer drug, saying the new allegations clear the legal bar for stock-drop class actions.
-
March 15, 2017
Puma Biotech Investors Seek Class Cert. In Stock-Drop Case
Puma Biotechnology Inc. investors who lost money when clinical trial results undercut the biopharmaceutical company's prior statements about a cancer drug it was developing asked a California federal court Wednesday for class status and to have Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP represent them.
-
October 03, 2016
Puma Investors' Suit Lives As Judge Dings Judicial Notice
Puma Biotechnology Inc. will have to face a proposed class action for allegedly misleading investors about a breast cancer drug, a California federal judge ruled in an order Friday that also included some criticism for the way defense attorneys have employed judicial notice requests.