Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Roy Jones et al v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc.

Track this case

Case Number:

2:15-cv-05766

Court:

California Central

Nature of Suit:

Contract Product Liability

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Firms

Companies

Porsche

Sectors & Industries:

Consumer Goods
- Major

October 19, 2015
Porsche Can't Ditch Windshield Glare Class Action

A California federal judge on Friday rejected a bid by Porsche to toss a proposed class action claiming its beige-colored dashboards can cause drivers to be temporarily blinded by reflecting the sun's glare onto windshields, finding the proposed claims have so far been adequately supported.
October 02, 2015
Porsche Denies Knowledge Of Glare Defect, Can't Control Sun

Porsche said in California federal court Thursday that a proposed class action claiming its beige dashboards reflect blinding sunlight onto windshields should be dismissed with prejudice, arguing that the plaintiffs haven't provided any proof that the automaker knew about the purported defect.
September 25, 2015
Porsche Can't Nix Windshield Defect Suit, Drivers Say

A proposed class accusing Porsche Cars North America Inc. of selling beige-colored dashboards that can cause a sun glare which momentarily blinds drivers told a California federal court Thursday that the automaker's attempt to minimize the alleged defect isn't enough to escape the suit.
September 08, 2015
Porsche Says Windshield Glare Is Not A Defect

Porsche Cars North America Inc. asked a California federal court Friday to dismiss a proposed class action claiming it knew light-colored dashboards caused a sun glare affecting a driver's vision, arguing the plaintiffs present no evidence of the alleged defect.
September 02, 2015
Porsche Owners Fail To Recuse Judge In Defect Suit

A California federal court refused Wednesday to recuse the judge overseeing a proposed class action alleging Porsche Cars North America Inc. concealed the safety risk of certain dashboards, despite the jurist's having defended the automaker early in his legal career.