Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Personalized Media Communications, LLC v. Apple, Inc.
Case Number:
2:15-cv-01366
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Akin Gump
- Antonelli Harrington
- Capshaw DeRieux
- Gillam Smith
- Goodwin Procter
- Greenberg Traurig
- Kheyfits Belenky
- King & Spalding
- Kirkland & Ellis
- K&L Gates
- Sheppard Mullin
- Susman Godfrey
- Vinson & Elkins
- Williams Simons
Companies
- Apple Inc.
- Foxconn
- Personalized Media Communications LLC
- TPV Technology Ltd.
- Vizio Inc.
- Wistron Corp.
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 11, 2021
Nuked Apple Verdict Highlights Potential New Patent Defense
Two recent rulings, including one that torpedoed a $308.5 million verdict against Apple, could spur greater use of a rarely invoked rule that renders patents unenforceable when the inventor delays the application process, potentially casting a shadow on some common filing strategies.
-
August 06, 2021
Apple Foe's 'Egregious' Patent Tactics Undo $308.5M Verdict
A Texas federal judge overturned a jury's $308.5 million patent verdict against Apple, bashing an inventor's "egregious misuse" of the patent system by slow-walking applications to artificially extend protections in secret while a market for infringing products grew.
-
July 07, 2021
Apple Takes Aim At $308.5M EDTX Verdict
Apple asked U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap to wipe out a $308.5 million jury verdict that a patent-holding company won in March, telling the judge that a Federal Circuit ruling last month against a different prolific inventor adds fuel to the tech giant's argument that the company purposely kept its inventions secret for decades and forfeited its patents.
-
March 19, 2021
Apple Hit With $308.5M Verdict In EDTX Patent Trial
An Eastern District of Texas jury decided Friday that Apple infringed a Personalized Media Communications patent on decrypting digital media content and must pay $308.5 million in damages.
-
January 08, 2021
Apple Faces Uphill Battle To Nix Patent In FairPlay IP Suit
A Texas federal magistrate judge on Friday recommended tossing Apple Inc.'s bid to dodge patent infringement allegations over its FairPlay secure streaming technology, rejecting Apple's argument that one of the patents in the dispute doesn't apply to its products in light of a recent Federal Circuit ruling.
-
September 15, 2016
Apple's Alice Defense Fizzles In Decryption Suit, Judge Says
A federal magistrate in the Eastern District of Texas said Tuesday that decryption patents asserted against Apple Inc. over its FairPlay secure streaming technology don't claim abstract ideas invalid for patent protection under Alice, also finding that prior litigation shouldn't bar the present lawsuit.
-
July 31, 2015
Intellectual Property Pulse: Apple, The Doobie Brothers
More than 180 intellectual property complaints were filed in federal courts across the U.S. during the past week. Here, Law360 takes a look at the biggest patent, trademark and copyright suits of the week and the firms that filed them — which included Capshaw DeRieux LLP, Owen Wickersham & Erickson PC and Freedman and Taitelman LLP.