Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Conversant Wireless Licensing S.A.R.L., v. Apple Inc.
Case Number:
5:15-cv-05008
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Alston & Bird
- Bartko Zankel
- Benesch
- Bunsow De Mory
- Dickinson Wright
- Folio Law Group
- Gillam Smith
- Hueston Hennigan
- Katten Muchin
- Mayer Brown
- MoloLamken
- Noroozi PC
- Russ August & Kabat
- Stubbs Alderton
- Vedder Price
- Ward and Smith
- WilmerHale
Companies
- Apple Inc.
- Conversant LLC
- Conversant Wireless Licensing Ltd.
- Microsoft Corp.
- Nokia Corp.
- Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 15, 2019
Apple Spared $3.4M Penalty By Nokia's Late IP Disclosure
Apple Inc. won't have to pay up for infringing one of Conversant Wireless Licensing SARL's wireless communications technology patents because the patent's original owner, Nokia Corp., didn't disclose it in a timely fashion to European telecom regulators, a California federal court has ruled.
-
April 28, 2017
Apple Can't Nix $7.3M Patent Verdict, Court Rules
A California federal judge on Thursday rejected Apple's arguments that a jury's verdict was not based on sound evidence and that it calculated damages based on a flawed model, letting stand a $7.3 million verdict against Apple for infringing Core Wireless' mobile communications patents.
-
March 01, 2017
Apple, Core Wireless Spar Over $7.3M Patent Verdict
Apple and Core Wireless fought in California federal court Wednesday over whether a jury got it wrong when it hit Apple with a $7.3 million verdict for infringing Core Wireless' mobile communications patents, with Apple arguing that the jury misinterpreted the patents and calculated damages based on a flawed model.
-
January 20, 2017
Apple Fights $7M Core Wireless Patent Loss
Apple urged a California federal court Thursday to invalidate two of Core Wireless' mobile communications patents or allow a new trial, after getting hit with a $7.3 million verdict for infringing Core Wireless technology that purportedly lets Apple products work "wherever and whenever."
-
December 15, 2016
Apple Hit With $7.3M Verdict In Core Wireless Patent Suit
A California federal jury found Thursday that Apple Inc.’s iPads and iPhones infringe two of Core Wireless Licensing SARL's mobile communication patents, awarding Core Wireless $7.3 million in damages in a long-running fight over technology that purportedly allows Apple's products to work "wherever, and whenever."
-
December 09, 2016
Apple Gadgets Don't Infringe Core Wireless, Profs Tell Jury
Two computer engineering professors hired as experts by Apple Inc. testified before a California federal jury on Friday that its iPhones and iPads don't infringe two Core Wireless mobile communication patents, saying the asserted claims are invalid as either anticipated or made obvious by prior art.
-
November 16, 2016
Apple Beats Back Core Wireless Theory As IP Trial Nears
A California federal magistrate judge told Core Wireless Licensing S.a.r.l. Wednesday that it couldn't argue in an upcoming trial that Apple Inc. infringed its wireless technology patents under the doctrine of equivalents, saying the argument was presented after discovery closed and it was "too little, too late."