Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Noye v. Johnson & Johnson et al
Case Number:
1:15-cv-02382
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 14, 2018
J&J Can't Arbitrate Applicant's Background Check Claims
A Pennsylvania federal judge held that a would-be employee’s arbitration agreement with a staffing firm can’t be used to force him to arbitrate claims that a Johnson & Johnson subsidiary unfairly revoked his job offer because of a background check, saying his allegations against J&J stem from the Fair Credit Reporting Act, not the contract.
-
November 20, 2017
J&J Says Applicant Must Arbitrate Background Check Claims
A Johnson & Johnson subsidiary urged a Pennsylvania federal judge Monday to order that a would-be employee must arbitrate claims that he unfairly lost his job offer due to a background check, noting she has already ordered the man to arbitrate his closely intertwined allegations against the staffing company that facilitated the hiring process.
-
November 07, 2017
J&J Job Candidate Must Arbitrate Claims Against Recruiter
A Pennsylvania federal judge on Monday granted recruiter Kelly Services Inc.'s renewed bid to arbitrate a putative class action alleging a would-be employee unfairly lost his job offer due to a background check, finding the worker, who was in line for a position with Johnson & Johnson, had signed a valid arbitration agreement.
-
September 07, 2016
Johnson & Johnson, Kelly Services Lose FCRA Arbitration Bid
A Pennsylvania federal judge on Wednesday denied bids from Johnson & Johnson and Kelly Services Inc. to arbitrate Fair Credit Reporting Act claims brought by a would-be employee in a putative class action over alleged nondisclosure of a background check that led to the loss of a job offer.
-
December 14, 2015
J&J Hit With Class Suit Alleging FCRA Violations
Johnson & Johnson and staffing company Kelly Services have been hit with a putative class action accusing them of violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act after rescinding an applicant's job offer based on a criminal conviction found in his consumer report without properly disclosing the report's employment purposes.