Polaris Innovations Limited v. Kingston Technology Company, Inc.

  1. June 20, 2017

    Flash Drive-Maker Can't Get Docs In Samsung Patent Fight

    A California federal judge denied a bid Friday by flash drive-maker Kingston Technology to force nonpracticing entity Polaris Innovations to produce certain documents in a computer memory patent infringement case involving Samsung Electronics Co., saying Polaris properly withheld them under attorney-client privilege.

  2. June 15, 2017

    Justices' Look At IPRs Keeps Memory IP Case Moving: Polaris

    A unit of major patent licensing firm WiLAN asked a California federal court on Wednesday to forgo a proposed pause of a computer memory patent infringement case involving Samsung Electronics Co., saying it's unfair to pause the suit pending inter partes review since the U.S. Supreme Court may simply wipe out those reviews.

  3. April 07, 2017

    Samsung Must Face Antitrust Claim In WiLAN Patent Case

    A federal judge has rejected Samsung's bid to dismiss antitrust allegations that it funds "sham" infringement litigation by a unit of major patent licensing firm WiLAN against Kingston Technology Co. Inc. and others that threaten Samsung's dominant position in the computer chip market.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!