Shields et al v. General Mills, Inc.

Track this case

Case Number:

0:16-cv-00954

Court:

Minnesota

Nature of Suit:

Civil Rights: Jobs

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Michael J. Davis

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. January 02, 2018

    Ex-General Mills Employees Must Arbitrate Age Bias Claims

    A Minnesota federal judge on Tuesday ordered a group of laid-off General Mills employees to take their age bias claims to arbitration, pointing to an Eighth Circuit decision from April sending another set of claims to arbitration per an identical clause in the workers' severance agreements.

  2. December 20, 2017

    No DQ For Attorneys In General Mills Age Bias Suit

    General Mills Inc.'s attempts to disqualify attorneys representing former employees bringing age discrimination claims against the food giant were thwarted Wednesday, when a Minnesota federal judge found that the attorneys took sufficient steps to prevent the minimal possibility that a worker had access to confidential information.

  3. December 01, 2017

    Attys Needn't Be DQ'd In General Mills Age Bias Row: Judge

    A Minnesota federal magistrate judge on Friday recommended against disqualifying Snyder & Brandt PA and Nichols Kaster PLLP from representing former General Mills Inc. employees bringing age discrimination claims against the food giant, saying the attorneys took sufficient steps to prevent the minimal possibility that a worker had access to confidential information.

  4. September 20, 2017

    General Mills Says Age Bias Class Counsel Needs To Be DQ'd

    General Mills Inc. asked a Minnesota federal court Tuesday to disqualify Snyder & Brandt PA and Nichols Kaster PLLP from representing plaintiffs in an age discrimination collective action, saying they "tainted" the case by not taking adequate measures to prevent a named plaintiff from sharing his knowledge about the company's litigation strategy.

  5. April 12, 2016

    General Mills Faces Employee Age Discrimination Suit

    General Mills was hit with a putative age discrimination collective action on Tuesday in Minnesota federal court that accuses the consumer foods giant of targeting workers aged 40 and over during a round of layoffs conducted as part of a company restructuring.