Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Illinois Transportation Trade, et al v. City of Chicago

  1. March 24, 2017

    Chicago Cabbies Take Uber Regs Fight To Supreme Court

    Chicago taxi companies Wednesday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear their arguments that city regulations covering ride-hailing platforms like Uber and Lyft violate the cab businesses' constitutional rights.

  2. November 01, 2016

    Chicago Taxis Ask Full 7th Circ. To Rethink Uber Regs Spat

    Chicago taxicab companies asked the full Seventh Circuit on Monday to review a panel ruling that city regulations covering ride-hailing platforms like Uber and Lyft do not trample on traditional taxicabs and limousines' constitutional rights, saying the panel preserved "irrational" regulations that kill competition.

  3. October 11, 2016

    7th Circ. Sides With Ride Hailing Cos. In Regulatory Spat

    The Seventh Circuit has found Chicago's separate regulations for the city's taxicab companies and ride-hailing services, including Uber Technologies Inc. and Lyft Inc., not to be prejudicial, saying that the entrance of new competitors into the market is not an unconstitutional taking of property of the Illinois Transportation Trade Association without compensation.

  4. September 19, 2016

    Posner Says Ride-Hailing And Cabs 'Clearly Different'

    Seventh Circuit Judge Richard A. Posner rejected a Chicago taxi trade association's argument that the city's regulation structure unconstitutionally hinders cab companies from competing with ride-hailing apps like Lyft and Uber, saying Monday that differential treatment is appropriate because there are "clearly differences" between the products.