Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Romero et al v. Securus Technologies, Inc.
Case Number:
3:16-cv-01283
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Crosner Legal
- Foley & Lardner
- Law Office of Robert L. Teel
- Law Offices of Ronald A. Marron
- O'Hagan Meyer
- Squire Patton
- Watkins Firm APC
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
September 20, 2016
Prison Callers Defend Atty Call Recording Suit
Callers accusing prison telephone service provider Securus Technologies Inc. of recording privileged calls between inmates and their lawyers, against promises and legal obligations to not do so, asked a California federal court Monday to keep their proposed class action alive, saying they were harmed enough to sue.
-
May 31, 2016
Prison Phone Co. Accused Of Recording Atty-Client Calls
Securus Technologies Inc. was hit with a proposed class action in California federal court Friday accusing the prison phone telephone service provider of recording privileged calls between inmates and their lawyers, despite promises and legal obligations not to do so.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next →