Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Blackberry Limited et al v. Avaya Inc
Case Number:
3:16-cv-02185
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 25, 2017
Judge Cracks Avaya's Ch. 11 Shield For BlackBerry Suit
A New York bankruptcy judge cracked open telecom giant Avaya Inc.'s Chapter 11 litigation shield Tuesday, allowing a pair of defense motions to move forward in BlackBerry Corp.'s patent infringement suit against the company.
-
April 19, 2017
Avaya Argues For Continued Stay Of BlackBerry's Patent Suit
Bankrupt telecom giant Avaya Inc. told a New York bankruptcy judge on Tuesday that BlackBerry Corp.'s bid to lift the debtor's Chapter 11 litigation shield for allegedly continuing to sell infringing products is without good cause and, if granted, could thwart the company's restructuring.
-
February 13, 2017
BlackBerry Seeks To Lift Avaya's Ch. 11 Stay On Patent Suit
BlackBerry Corp. on Friday asked a New York bankruptcy court to lift the stay on its patent suit against Avaya Inc., claiming that the company is continuing to sell the allegedly infringing products.
-
August 03, 2016
BlackBerry Accuses Avaya Of Infringing Mobile, Tech Patents
Blackberry Ltd. has hurled a series of patent infringement allegations against Avaya Inc. in Texas federal court, saying multiple communications and software products infringe eight patents that it obtained to protect its technical innovations in mobile communications.