Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Queen's University at Kingston v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Case Number:
16-2723
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 10, 2018
Fed. Circ. Upholds Samsung's PTAB Win Over Eye Sensor IP
The Federal Circuit on Wednesday upheld the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's decision to invalidate claims tied to eye sensor technology patented by a Canadian university, after the school accused Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. of infringing them.
-
January 11, 2017
School Tells Fed. Circ. PTAB Botched Samsung Sensor Case
Ontario-based Queen's University at Kingston urged the Federal Circuit on Monday to undo a Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision that invalidated claims related to eye sensor technology that the school had accused Samsung of violating, saying the board messed up the review process.