Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
First State Insurance Company, et al v. Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. et al
Case Number:
3:16-cv-01822
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Clyde & Co
- Cohn Birnbaum
- Cooney Scully
- Dombroski Hillis
- Ford Marrin
- Halloran & Sage
- Litchfield Cavo
- Pasich LLP
- Rivkin Radler
- Ruggeri Parks
- Shipman & Goodwin
- Walker Wilcox
Companies
- American Home Assurance Co.
- Ferguson Enterprises Inc.
- Granite State Insurance Co.
- Swiss Reinsurance Co. Ltd.
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 29, 2018
Insurers Blast Rival's Bid To Revive Asbestos Coverage Row
Several insurance companies told a Connecticut federal court Friday it should deny First State Insurance Co.'s request to reconsider clearing the insurers of allegations they failed to pay their fair share to cover a plumbing piping company named in various asbestos suits, telling the court First State has not presented any new evidence.
-
September 28, 2018
Claims Cut Back In Insurers' Asbestos Pipe Liability Spat
A Connecticut federal court on Friday granted a quick win to a group of insurance companies in a suit brought by First State Insurance Co. alleging the other insurers failed to pay their fair share to cover a plumbing piping company named in various asbestos suits, finding that the claims were time-barred for some insurers and exceeded policy limits for others.