Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Glass Ceiling Report
- Global 20
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Site Menu
- Join the Law360 team
- Search legal jobs
- Learn more about Law360
- Read testimonials
- Contact Law360
- Sign up for our newsletters
- Site Map
- Help
We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close
January 5, 2017
Liqwd, Inc. et al v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
Case Number:
1:17-cv-00014
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
June 28, 2018
Haircare Co. Says PTAB Patent Ax 'Not Binding' In L'Oreal Row
Haircare startup Olaplex on Thursday urged a Delaware federal judge to deny L’Oreal’s bid to pause a suit accusing the cosmetics giant of infringing a patented “bond multiplier” treatment for dyed hair, arguing that a Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision on its patent is “not binding” on the district court.
Parties
To view the parties, register now.
Try Law360 FREE for seven days
Already a subscriber? Click here to login