Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Federal Trade Commission v. Qualcomm Incorporated
Case Number:
5:17-cv-00220
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Sidley Austin
- Kirkland & Ellis
- K&L Gates
- Davis Wright Tremaine
- Bleichmar Fonti
- Wilkinson Stekloff
- Cleary Gottlieb
- Wilson Sonsini
- WilmerHale
- Barrack Rodos
- Pritzker Levine
- Munger Tolles
- Norton Rose
- Baker Botts
- Eimer Stahl
- Dority & Manning
- KXT Law
- Hunton Andrews
- Lieff Cabraser
- Perkins Coie
- Williams & Connolly
- Kwun Bhansali
- Shook Hardy
- Goodwin Procter
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Hausfeld LLP
- Gibson Dunn
- Cravath Swaine
- Morgan Lewis
- Cotchett Pitre
- Baker McKenzie
- Paul Weiss
- Steven Williams Law
- Quinn Emanuel
- Sheppard Mullin
- Winston & Strawn
- Irell & Manella
- Berman Tabacco
- Boies Schiller
- Squire Patton
- Freshfields
- Keker Van Nest & Peters
- McDermott Will & Emery
- Wright L'Estrange
- Susman Godfrey
- Alston & Bird
- Redgrave LLP
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Orrick Herrington
Companies
- Wistron Corp.
- Marvell Technology Inc.
- Apple Inc.
- Motorola Mobility LLC
- Google LLC
- Lenovo Group Ltd.
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- Kyocera Corporation
- Panasonic Corp.
- NVIDIA Corp.
- Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
- Nokia Corp.
- ASUSTeK Computer Inc.
- Texas Instruments Inc.
- Pegatron Corp.
- T-Mobile US Inc.
- LG Electronics Inc.
- Lawyers for Civil Justice
- Broadcom Inc.
- MediaTek Inc.
- Via Licensing Corp.
- QUALCOMM Inc.
- Verizon Communications Inc.
- InterDigital Inc.
- Intel Corp.
- Foxconn
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 17, 2017
FTC Sues Qualcomm Over Standard-Essential Patent Licenses
The Federal Trade Commission accused Qualcomm on Tuesday of using its dominance over the sale of semiconductors for mobile devices to wrangle higher royalties and anti-competitive licensing terms from cellphone makers for its standard-essential patents.