Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Qualcomm Incorporated Securities Litigation v. Qualcomm Incorporated et al
Case Number:
3:17-cv-00121
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- A&O Shearman
- Bernstein Litowitz
- Bleichmar Fonti
- Boies Schiller
- Cooley LLP
- Cravath Swaine
- DiCello Levitt
- Eimer Stahl
- Jones Day
- Keker Van Nest & Peters
- Motley Rice
- Pomerantz LLP
- Seltzer Caplan
- Sheppard Mullin
- Sidley Austin
- Vinson & Elkins
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
March 21, 2023
Judge Grants Partial Class Cert. In Qualcomm Investor Suit
A California federal judge won't certify a proposed class of investors in a stock-drop suit against Qualcomm Inc. regarding the class' alleged licensing misrepresentation claims, but did grant class certification on the claim alleging that Qualcomm misled the market by stating it kept its licensing and chip-supply businesses separate when it regularly bundled the two in negotiations and agreements.
-
January 16, 2020
Qualcomm Seeks To Kill Investor Action Over FTC Case
Qualcomm Inc. is once again gunning to shut down a stock-drop suit lodged in the wake of a U.S. antitrust enforcement action over its licensing strategy, arguing that newly assembled public documents prove the chipmaker disclosed its practices and their potential to expose the company to legal trouble.
-
March 18, 2019
Qualcomm Can't Shake Investor Suit Over Licensing Battles
Qualcomm Inc. lost its bid Monday to shut down investors' claims that the chipmaker and its top officials lied about the company's anti-competitive licensing practices that ultimately sparked an enforcement action, tanked the company's stock price and cost shareholders billions.
-
January 24, 2017
Qualcomm Hit With Shareholder Suit Over FTC, Apple Claims
Qualcomm Inc. was hit with a proposed class action in California federal court Monday alleging the company and its top officials misled investors and inflated share prices in the wake of Federal Trade Commission and Apple lawsuits alleging the company engaged in anti-competitive behavior with cellphone makers over its baseband processors.