Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
State of Washington, et al., v. Trump., et al
Case Number:
2:17-cv-00141
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Barnard Iglitzin
- Hagens Berman
- Lane Powell
- Mayer Brown
- Morgan Lewis
- Pacifica Law Group
- Perkins Coie
- Proskauer Rose
- Social Media Victims Law Center
Companies
- American Civil Liberties Union
- American Civil Liberties Union of Washington
- New York University
- Service Employees International Union
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 27, 2017
Wash. Judge Won't Halt Trump's 3rd Travel Ban
A Washington federal court on Friday refused to block the most recent iteration of President Donald Trump's travel ban from going into effect, saying Hawaii's temporary restraining order provides the desired relief, and declined to lift the stay on a suit by six states challenging the initial travel ban.
-
October 12, 2017
Six States Request Halt Of 3rd Travel Ban
Several states asked a Washington federal court Wednesday to lift the stay of proceedings in a suit challenging President Donald Trump’s initial travel ban and order a temporary restraining order preventing the most recent iteration of the ban from going into effect this month.
-
March 17, 2017
Wash. Court Won't Apply Old Block To New Travel Ban Order
A Washington federal court on Thursday refused to apply its previous block on President Donald Trump's initial travel ban to parts of his new executive order, finding the "limited scope" of its last injunction didn't transfer over, and on Friday stayed its determination of a temporary restraining order motion.
-
March 14, 2017
Trump Says New Travel Ban Answers Suing States' Concerns
The Trump administration told a Washington federal judge Tuesday that its newly revised immigration ban is "substantially different" from an earlier version halted after states raised constitutional concerns, while pushing back against the contention that the ban is religiously motivated.
-
March 13, 2017
Injunction Applies To Resurrected Travel Ban, States Say
Washington state Attorney General Bob Ferguson officially asked a federal court on Monday to apply an injunction against President Donald Trump's first immigration ban, which barred immigrants from seven Muslim-majority nations, to a second, modified version of the executive order.
-
March 10, 2017
Judge Refuses To Move Ahead In Wash. Travel Ban Case
A Washington federal judge refused to move ahead in a case over President Donald Trump's latest travel ban on Friday, pointing out that there wasn't actually a pending motion before the court, but rather just a notice of the new executive order and responses.
-
February 23, 2017
Oregon Seeks To Join Wash. Challenge To Trump Travel Ban
Oregon wants in on the lawsuit filed by the state of Washington that challenges President Donald Trump's executive order and its travel ban for certain foreign-born individuals, arguing Wednesday that it seeks to ensure that any relief that arises from the case protects the state and its residents.
-
February 14, 2017
Wash. Judge Refuses To Delay Trump's Immigration Ban Suit
U.S. District Judge James Robart on Monday reportedly declined President Donald Trump and his administration's request to delay proceedings in a suit in Washington federal court challenging the constitutionality of his executive order banning travel from several mostly Muslim countries.
-
February 07, 2017
9th Circ. Weighs Trump Travel Ban In Contentious Hearing
A Ninth Circuit panel on Tuesday grilled both sides in a contentious hearing on the government's bid to reinstate President Donald Trump's ban on travelers from seven predominantly Muslim countries, raising questions about the plaintiff's standing and the president's authority to use religion as a criterion in barring travelers to the United States.
-
February 06, 2017
DOJ Pushes 9th Circ. For Stay On Immigration Ban Ruling
The U.S. Department of Justice urged the Ninth Circuit on Monday to stay the court order blocking implementation of the immigration ban contained in President Donald Trump's recent executive order, claiming the order is a lawful use of presidential power and that the court's nationwide block is "vastly overbroad."