Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Clark et al v City of Seattle et al
-
August 25, 2017
Judge Unleashes Seattle's Uber Unionization Law
A Washington federal judge on Thursday lifted a preliminary block on Seattle's Uber ordinance allowing gig-economy drivers to unionize, dismissing one suit brought by drivers and denying the U.S. Chamber of Commerce a new injunction as the business lobby seeks to revive its antitrust challenge.
-
May 03, 2017
Drivers Fight Seattle's Bid To Nix Uber, Lyft Union Law Case
A group of independent drivers have urged a Washington state federal judge not to toss their suit against the city of Seattle challenging an ordinance allowing for-hire drivers for Uber, Lyft and other ride-hailing apps to unionize, saying federal law preempts the ordinance.
-
March 13, 2017
Drivers Join Fight Over Seattle Uber, Lyft Unionization Law
Eleven independent drivers sued the city of Seattle in federal court Friday claiming its new ordinance allowing for-hire drivers for Uber, Lyft and other ride-hailing apps to unionize is unconstitutional and unfairly forces all drivers to comply with terms set by designated unions just to use the app.