Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
In Re: Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
5:17-md-02773
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action, Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Freed Kanner
- Finkelstein Thompson
- Renne Public Law Group
- Berman Tabacco
- Barnes & Thornburg
- Kwun Bhansali
- Frank LLP
- Eimer Stahl
- Steyer Lowenthal
- Crowell & Moring
- Faegre Drinker
- Barrack Rodos
- Schneider Wallace
- Pritzker Levine
- Hach Rose Schirripa
- Joseph Saveri Law Firm
- Zuber Lawler
- Stueve Siegel
- Kaplan Fox
- Spector Roseman
- Fenwick & West
- Schneider Wallace Cottrell Konecky LLP
- Wiggin & Dana
- Perkins Coie
- Scheper Kim
- Moore IP Law
- Hagens Berman
- Bleichmar Fonti
- Robins Kaplan
- Goodwin Procter
- Boies Schiller
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Baker Botts
- Pettit Kohn
- Winston & Strawn
- BoiesBattin
- Berger Montague
- Sidley Austin
- Nassiri & Jung
- Sher Edling
- Cleary Gottlieb
- Norton Rose
- Herrera Kennedy
- Bramson Plutzik
- Williams & Connolly
- Allen Matkins
- Hartley LLP
- Keller Rohrback
- Cafferty Clobes
- Hausfeld LLP
- Sheppard Mullin
- Robinson Calcagnie
- Gibson Dunn
- Cravath Swaine
- Keker Van Nest & Peters
- Shook Hardy
- Morgan Lewis
- Wolf Haldenstein
- Cotchett Pitre
- Baker McKenzie
- Paul Weiss
- Orrick Herrington
- Mehdi Firm
- Wilson Sonsini
- Irell & Manella
- Weitz & Luxenberg
- Morrison Foerster
- Susman Godfrey
- Alston & Bird
- Milberg Coleman
- Kirby McInerney
- K&L Gates
- WilmerHale
Companies
- HTC Corporation
- Avanci
- TD SYNNEX Corp.
- Ingram Micro Inc.
- Spectrum Management Holding Co.
- Pegatron Corp.
- Best Buy Co. Inc.
- Motorola Mobility LLC
- Google LLC
- Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
- Amazon.com Inc.
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- Kyocera Corporation
- T-Mobile US Inc.
- Nokia Corp.
- Apple Inc.
- EE Ltd.
- MediaTek Inc.
- Target Corp.
- ASUSTeK Computer Inc.
- NVIDIA Corp.
- LG Electronics Inc.
- Wistron Corp.
- Lenovo Group Ltd.
- QUALCOMM Inc.
- AT&T Inc.
- InterDigital Inc.
- Verizon Communications Inc.
- Intel Corp.
- Foxconn
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 13, 2018
Qualcomm Says Buyers Have No Say In IPhone Import Row
Smartphone consumers pursuing antitrust multidistrict litigation over Qualcomm's patent licensing practices can't block the chipmaker from trying to force Apple to only import iPhones with Qualcomm chipsets, Qualcomm told a California federal judge Thursday, arguing the import matter is totally unrelated.
-
July 06, 2018
Cellphone Buyers Seek Cert. In Qualcomm Chip Price-Fix Suit
Smartphone buyers urged a California federal judge Friday to certify an antitrust class action accusing Qualcomm of fixing the price of microchips used in cellphones.
-
June 28, 2018
Consumers Slam Qualcomm's Bid To Limit IPhone Imports
Smartphone consumers urged a California federal judge Thursday to prevent Qualcomm's attempt to force Apple to only import iPhones with Qualcomm chipsets, saying the chipmaker must face their antitrust multidistrict litigation over its patent licensing practices first.
-
March 27, 2018
Qualcomm Can Hold Back Full EU Decision In Antitrust Row
A California federal judge on Monday said Qualcomm Inc. does not have to turn over an unredacted version of the European Commission decision leveling it with a massive fine for abuse of dominance, as the chipmaker fights multidistrict litigation over its patent licensing practices.
-
February 26, 2018
FTC, Consumers Lose Special Master Bid In Qualcomm Row
A California federal judge has denied a bid by the Federal Trade Commission and a proposed class of consumers to have a special master appointed for discovery in an antitrust suit over Qualcomm Inc.'s patent licensing practices.
-
February 22, 2018
Judge Wants Class Attys' Billing Records In Qualcomm Row
A California federal judge overseeing antitrust claims related to Qualcomm's patent licensing practices asked attorneys for a putative class of chip buyers to hand over billing records while the case is ongoing, saying that although such records are typically reviewed at litigation's end, "that is kind of too late" to ensure good-faith billing.
-
February 08, 2018
Apple Sanctions Nixed In Qualcomm Antitrust Battle
A California federal judge on Wednesday lifted a $300,000 sanctions order against Apple Inc. for missing a document production deadline in the Federal Trade Commission's antitrust case against Qualcomm Inc., ruling that a magistrate judge cited unclear authority in issuing the order.
-
February 01, 2018
Atty Group Skewers $300K Apple Sanctions In Qualcomm Row
A legal industry advocacy group asked a California federal judge Wednesday to lift a $300,000 sanction levied on third party Apple for missing a deadline to produce documents requested by Qualcomm in antitrust suits brought against it by the Federal Trade Commission, saying the penalty was "completely out of step" with the law.
-
January 05, 2018
Apple Hit With $300K Sanction In Qualcomm Antitrust Row
A federal magistrate judge in California said Friday he'll sanction Apple Inc. to the tune of $300,000 for missing a document production deadline in antitrust suits brought against Qualcomm Inc. by the Federal Trade Commission and a putative class of cellphone buyers, after saying in an earlier hearing he wanted to encourage other third parties in the litigation to meet deadlines.
-
January 04, 2018
Apple Calls $25K Daily Sanctions In Qualcomm Case Harsh
Apple asked a California federal court on Wednesday to nix a $25,000-per-day fine, arguing that the sanctions imposed by a magistrate judge last month for delays in producing documents in the antitrust litigation against Qualcomm were unduly harsh.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next →