Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
In Re Snap Inc. Securities Litigation
Case Number:
2:17-cv-03679
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Block & Leviton
- Bottini & Bottini
- Faruqi & Faruqi
- Freshfields
- Glancy Prongay
- Kahn Swick
- Kessler Topaz
- Labaton Keller
- Larson LLP
- Levi & Korsinsky
- Panish Shea
- Paul Weiss
- Pomerantz LLP
- Rosen Law Firm PA
- Rosman & Germain
- Schall Law
- Wilson Sonsini
Companies
- Allen & Company LLC
- Barclays PLC
- BTIG LLC
- Citigroup Inc.
- Credit Suisse Group AG
- Deutsche Bank AG
- Evercore Inc.
- Jefferies Financial Group Inc.
- JMP Group Inc.
- JPMorgan Chase & Co.
- Morgan Stanley
- RBC Capital Markets
- Stifel Financial Corp.
- The Goldman Sachs Group Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 19, 2021
Kessler Topaz Garners $41.1M For Repping Snap Investors
Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check LLP attorneys will take home $41.1 million for their work representing social media giant Snap Inc. investors in a suit alleging fraud, even as the federal judge who approved the deal opined that the overall fee request process does not face any "meaningful opposition and rigorous testing."
-
January 12, 2021
Attys For Snap Investors Seek $41M From $155M Deal
Investors of Snap Inc. asked a California federal judge Monday to approve $41.1 million in attorney fees and expenses for Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check LLP, as they seek final approval of a nearly $155 million settlement over the social media giant's initial public offering.
-
March 23, 2020
Snap Agrees To Pay $155M In IPO Class Action Settlement
Snap Inc. has agreed to pay nearly $155 million to resolve allegations that the social media giant concealed problematic growth metrics ahead of its initial public offering, according to a motion filed Friday.
-
January 21, 2020
Snapchat To Settle With Investors In IPO Fight
After two and a half years of fierce litigation, the company behind Snapchat and its investors told a California federal court that they reached a settlement resolving accusations that the social media giant concealed problematic growth metrics ahead of its initial public offering.
-
December 04, 2019
Snapchat Takes Class Cert. Fight In IPO Suit To 9th Circ.
Snap Inc., the parent company of social media giant Snapchat, petitioned the Ninth Circuit Tuesday for permission to appeal a lower court's class certification in an investor suit accusing Snap of concealing problematic growth metrics ahead of its initial public offering.
-
November 21, 2019
Snap Investors Win Cert. In IPO Class Action
Shareholders in Snapchat parent Snap Inc. won certification in California federal court Wednesday in their class action over the company's alleged cover-up of problematic growth metrics ahead of its initial public offering.
-
July 16, 2019
Snapchat Investors Slam Bids To Block Cert. In IPO Suit
Investors alleging Snapchat parent Snap Inc. misrepresented user growth and engagement in documents related to its initial public offering told a California federal judge Monday that letting state-court plaintiffs intervene and split claims from the federal case would undermine the very reasons class actions exist.
-
July 15, 2019
Snapchat Fights Class Cert. Bid In Investors' IPO Suit
Snap Inc., the parent company of social media giant Snapchat, urged a California federal judge Friday to reject a certification bid by a proposed shareholder class accusing the company of conducting a fraudulent initial public offering, arguing that the investors' claims were lodged too late and the class definition is "overbroad."
-
June 25, 2019
Snapchat Investor Urges Against Class Cert. In IPO Suit
A dissenting Snapchat investor asked a California federal judge not to certify a shareholder class in a suit accusing the social media giant of conducting a fraudulent initial public offering, telling the court Monday that the proposed damages model would leave IPO investors with little relief.
-
June 10, 2019
Snap Investors Lob New Class Cert. Bid In Suit Over IPO
Investors alleging Snapchat parent Snap Inc. misrepresented user growth and engagement in documents related to its initial public offering urged a California federal court on Friday to certify a class of investors, less than a year after they first sought class status in the suit.