Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Continental Service Group Inc. v. US
Case Number:
17-2155
Court:
Nature of Suit:
140 Contract - Injunction (Post Award)
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 12, 2018
DeVos-Linked Firm Wins Ed. Dept. Deal Ahead Of Ruling
The Federal Circuit on Friday partially lifted an injunction on a disputed $2.8 billion U.S. Department of Education debt collection deal, but its ruling is effectively academic since the department issued new contract awards, including to a firm linked to Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, shortly before the decision was issued.
-
August 16, 2017
Gov't Asks Fed. Circ. To Unfreeze $2.8B Student Debt Deal
The federal government and Alltran Education Inc. asked the Federal Circuit on Tuesday to ax a preliminary injunction preventing the U.S. Department of Education from executing $2.8 billion in hotly disputed debt collection services contracts, saying the Court of Federal Claims failed to properly evaluate the grounds for issuing the injunction.
-
July 19, 2017
Fed Circ. Won't Toss Injunction Appeal On $2.8B Gov't Deal
A Federal Circuit judge on Tuesday refused to dismiss an appeal seeking to stay preliminary injunctions preventing the U.S. Department of Education from moving forward with a $2.8 billion debt collection services contract, rejecting Continental Service Group Inc.'s argument that the court lacked jurisdiction over the appeal.
-
July 06, 2017
Gov't Contracts Cases To Watch In 2017: Midyear Report
Government contracts lawyers will be watching a variety of cases playing out in federal agencies and courts in the second half of 2017. Here, Law360 takes a look at a few such cases.
-
June 28, 2017
Fed Circ. Asked To Lift Bar On $2.8B Debt Collection Deal
The federal government on Tuesday urged the Federal Circuit to stay injunctions preventing the government from moving ahead with a $2.8 billion U.S. Department of Education debt collection services contract, saying it is losing revenue, but both winning bidders and protesters to the deal pushed back, arguing they will be harmed without the injunctions in place.